GRADIAS
Beschleunigen Sie die Korrektur von Prüfungen mit GRADIAS.
Report generated on April 5, 2026
A note on how to read this
This report is ProdPoke's take on your site — think of it as a first impression from a very opinionated robot. We check real things (load times, broken links, accessibility patterns), but we also try to understand what your site is trying to do and whether the technical details support that goal. Some of our observations might not apply to your specific situation, and that's okay. We're getting sharper with every scan. If something feels off, tell us — it makes us better.
Key Insights for GRADIAS
10 unlabeled buttons block screen reader users from understanding core grading controls
Educators with disabilities cannot navigate your exam grading interface. Since your platform's entire value depends on intuitive control of feedback delivery and exam uploads, inaccessible buttons directly prevent adoption by a segment of your target market and create legal liability under accessibility laws.
7 form inputs without labels make registration and exam configuration unusable for assistive technology
Teachers setting up exams or registering institutions cannot understand what each form field expects. This friction point happens at onboarding—the moment schools decide whether to commit to GRADIAS—and disproportionately impacts educators relying on screen readers.
Missing privacy policy violates GDPR and educational data protection requirements for a platform processing student exam data
Schools handling FERPA-protected student information cannot legally adopt GRADIAS without documented data protection commitments. This is a hard blocker for institutional sales, not a nice-to-have.
Absent terms of service create unresolved liability around exam ownership, AI model training, and data retention
Educational buyers need explicit guarantees that student exams won't be used to train your AI models and that your platform clearly owns responsibility for grading accuracy. Without this, procurement teams cannot move forward.
Missing sitemap.xml means search engines may skip feature pages educators search for (essay grading, math problem assessment)
Schools searching for 'AI essay grading for teachers' or 'automated math assessment' won't find your in-progress features. A sitemap ensures all planned functionality pages are indexed, allowing you to rank for emerging demand.
What ProdPoke understands about GRADIAS
GRADIAS is an AI-powered exam grading platform designed for educators across various disciplines. The product automates the assessment of student exams using modern AI technology, featuring handwriting recognition, AI-supported task correction across multiple question types, and instant individual feedback delivery. According to the pages, it currently supports short free text questions and multiple/single choice questions (marked as completed), with essays, math problems (single and multi-step), cloze texts, and curve discussion tasks either in progress or planned. The platform aims to save educators time on grading so they can focus on supporting student learning.
Based on exploring 2 pages across the site
First Impression — How clear is your site?
GRADIAS is an AI-powered platform for grading exams and tests. According to the page, it "accelerates the evaluation of exam performance with modern AI technology" and offers "automatic and accurate recognition of handwriting from different writing styles" plus "AI-based evaluation of various task types, including multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank and essays." The product is positioned for educators across different subjects.
This score measures how quickly a first-time visitor understands what your site does — based on visible headings, navigation, and visual hierarchy alone.
Overall Score
Strong foundation.
Performance
100/100SEO
91/100Page title too long (65 chars)
Your page title 'GRADIAS – KI-gestützte Klausurkorrektur für Schulen & Hochsc...' is 65 characters and will be truncated in search results when educators search for AI grading solutions. Consider shortening it to under 60 characters to ensure the full value proposition is visible in Google results.
Found: 65 characters
Meta description too long (189 chars)
Your meta description (189 characters) will be truncated in search results, cutting off key information about your exam grading platform. Reduce it to under 160 characters to ensure educators see the complete description when discovering GRADIAS in search results.
Found: 189 characters
No sitemap.xml found
Without a sitemap.xml, search engines may miss important pages of your grading platform (feature pages, documentation, pricing, etc.), reducing discoverability by schools and universities looking for assessment solutions.
Accessibility
70/10010 interactive element(s) without accessible names
10 interactive elements (likely buttons for grading features, exam uploads, or feedback controls) lack accessible names. Screen reader users—including educators with disabilities—cannot understand what these controls do, making the platform inaccessible.
Found: 10 missing: <button[type=submit].text-gray-600>, <input[type=hidden]>, <input[type=text].hidden>, <input[type=email].w-full>, <input[type=hidden]>
7 form input(s) without labels
7 form inputs (possibly in exam upload, teacher registration, or grading configuration) lack associated labels. This makes the platform difficult to use for educators relying on screen readers and reduces usability for all users filling out grading preferences.
Found: Missing labels: text: website, email: email, text: website, text: name, email: email
Compliance
76/100No privacy policy link found
No privacy policy link is visible. As an educational platform processing student exam data and handling sensitive academic information, GRADIAS is legally required to provide a privacy policy under GDPR and educational data protection laws (such as FERPA in the US).
No terms of service link found
No terms of service link found. Educational institutions and teachers need clear terms covering exam handling, data ownership, platform liability, and acceptable use of your AI grading system before adopting GRADIAS.
1 finding suppressed (not relevant to this site type)
Key Metrics
Crawlability
Standards
Improvement Plan
GRADIAS faces two critical bottlenecks preventing institutional adoption: accessibility and legal compliance. Start immediately with accessibility because it blocks both user experience and legal exposure. Your 10 unlabeled interactive elements and 7 form inputs without labels prevent educators with disabilities from using your platform at all—this violates WCAG 2.1 AA standards and creates liability. Audit every button (especially those controlling exam uploads, feedback generation, and grading workflows), every form field (especially in registration and exam configuration), and add aria-label attributes or associated <label> elements. Test with a screen reader (NVDA is free) to verify educators can complete a full grading workflow accessibly. This fix typically takes 4-6 hours for a platform of this scope.
Second, address compliance gaps immediately. Schools cannot move GRADIAS through procurement without a privacy policy and terms of service. Create a privacy policy explicitly addressing FERPA/GDPR compliance, data retention for student exam data, and confirming that student exams will not be used to train your AI models without explicit consent. In your terms of service, clarify data ownership (schools own exam data), liability limits around grading accuracy, and acceptable use (no unauthorized model training). Both documents should be linked prominently in your footer and during registration. This protects your enterprise sales motion—most schools require these before signing.
Third, implement sitemap.xml to ensure search engines discover all your feature pages (essays, math problems, cloze texts, curve discussion). This is quick—generate the sitemap and submit it to Google Search Console. It unlocks organic traffic from educators searching for specific grading capabilities you're building.
Finally, trim your page title to under 60 characters (currently 65) and meta description to under 160 characters (currently 189). Replace 'KI-gestützte Klausurkorrektur für Schulen & Hochschulen' with something like 'GRADIAS: AI Exam Grading for Teachers' to ensure educators see your value proposition in search results.
Suggested priority order:
- 10 interactive element(s) without accessible names
- 7 form input(s) without labels
- No privacy policy link found
- No terms of service link found
- No sitemap.xml found
- Page title too long (65 chars)
- Meta description too long (189 chars)
This is your site? Get the full picture.
Claim this report to unlock ongoing monitoring, deeper analysis, and actionable alerts.
What is ProdPoke?Automated analysis generated on April 5, 2026. Not professional advice. Contact us to modify or remove this report.